The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status of training evaluation in private banks and identify the challenges in it. The present study was carried out qualitatively with the case study method. In this regard, the statistical population of the present s More
The purpose of this study was to analyze the current status of training evaluation in private banks and identify the challenges in it. The present study was carried out qualitatively with the case study method. In this regard, the statistical population of the present study consisted of all training experts and specialists working in Private Banks that were selected non-randomly and purposefully. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect the research data. Also, for analyzing qualitative data, Graneheim and Lundman's method was used. To determine the validity and reliability of the data collected, the guidelines provided by Creswell and Poth was used. The results showed that per 1,000 Employee 2/6 training staff are in the training unit of the organizations. Also, 78% of the staff in the training unit in organizations have university education unrelated to their career. Another finding was that all private banks use Kirkpatrick's model to evaluate their training courses, and only three of the organizations have used other models to evaluate their training courses. Finally, the challenges faced by organizations in the field of training evaluation were categorized into 13 categories.
Manuscript profile
