تأثیر زمینه یادگیری¬زدایی بر نوآوری سازمانی با نقش میانجی اثربخشی سرمایه انسانی در دانشگاه رازی
محورهای موضوعی : همسوسازي استراتژي هاي يادگيري و توسعه با استراتژي سازمان
شهین بهور
1
(دانشگاه رازی)
نادر نادری
2
(دانشگاه رازی کرمانشاه)
کلید واژه: زمینه یادگیری, زدایی, نوآوری سازمانی, اثربخشی سرمایه انسانی, دانشگاه نسل سوم,
چکیده مقاله :
مساله و هدف: کنارگذاشتن دانش های منسوخ شده در سازمان برای جایگزینی دانش های جدید و ایجاد تغییرات در سازمان و انطباق سازمان با شرایط روز بسیار حائز اهمیت است. بدین منظور، در پژوهش حاضر به بررسی تأثیر زمینه یادگیری زدایی بر نوآوری سازمانی با نقش میانجی سرمایه انسانی در دانشگاه رازی پرداخته شد. روش شناسی: در این پژوهش از پرسشنامه های استاندارد زمینه یادگیری زدایی و سرمایه انسانی سگارا-ناوارو (2017) و پرسشنامه نوآوری سازمانی یانگ و احمد (2004) استفاده گردید. جامعه مورد مطالعه کارکنان دانشگاه رازی به تعداد 585 نفر و با استفاده از جدول مورگان 230 نفر به عنوان نمونه به صورت تصادفی انتخاب گردید. جهت تجزیه وتحلیل داده های گردآوری شده از روش معادالات ساختاری و تحلیل مسیر به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی در محیط نرم افزار (PLS) صورت گرفت. یافته ها : زمینه یادگیری زدایی بر نوآوری سازمانی تأثیر مثبت و معنادار دارد همچنین اثر مثبت و معنادار بین سرمایه انسانی و نوآوری سازمانی را تأیید می نماید و در نهایت اثر مثبت و معناداری بین زمینه یادگیری زدایی بر نوآوری سازمانی با نقش سرمایه انسانی را نشان می دهد. نتیجه گیری: در راستای ارائه خدمات نوآورانه مدیران و کارکنان دانشگاه باید دانش قدیمی خود را کنار گذاشته و از دانش جدید و بروز استفاده نمایند. لذا اتخاذ رویکرد نوآوری در دانشگاه ها منجر به ارتقا شایستگی های نیروی انسانی، علمی و فناورانه می شود. این تأثیر در نهایت منجر به بهبود وضع اقتصادی و گامی در جهت تغییر رویکرد دانشگاه به سمت دانشگاه نسل سوم و کارآفرین می گردد.
Purpose: Discarding outdated knowledge in the organization is very important to replace new knowledge and make changes in the organization and adapt the organization to the conditions of the day. For this purpose, in the present study, the effect of the Un-learning context of organizational innovation with the mediating role of human capital in Razi University was investigated. Methodology: In this study, standard questionnaires Un-learning, context desegregation, and human capital of Sagara-Navarro (2017) and Young and Ahmed Organizational Innovation Questionnaire (2004) were used. The study population of Razi University staff was 585 people and 230 people were selected as a sample using the Morgan table. In order to analyze the collected data by structural equation method and path analysis by partial least squares method in a software environment (PLS). Findings: show that the Un-learning context has a positive and significant effect on organizational innovation. Shows an organization with the role of human capital. Conclusion: In order to provide innovative services, university managers and staff should put aside their old knowledge and use new and updated knowledge. Therefore, adopting an innovative approach in universities leads to improving the competencies of human resources, science, and technology. This effect will eventually lead to an improvement in the economic situation and a step towards changing the university's approach towards a third-generation university and an entrepreneur.
1. Negarestani, M. The role of knowledge management system and open innovation in the development of innovation capacity, Innovation Management Quarterly, (2018), 7 (4), 81-110
2. Shahsavari, Amir, Alam al-Huda, Jamileh, Zaker Salehi, Gholamreza, Khorasani, Abaselat, Khademi, Maryam. General Layout,(2020), 10 (34), 2-34.
3. Draghici, A., Baban, C. F., Gogan, M. L., & Ivascu, L. V. A knowledge management approach for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, (2015), 23, 23-32.
4. Sakapurnama, E., Huseini, M., & Soeling, P. D. Building Entrepreneurial University: Case from HEI’s in Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, (2019), 7(12), 2747-2754.
5. Novela, S., Syarief, R., Fahmi, I., & Arkeman, Y. Creating a University-Based Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Indonesia. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, (2021), 10(1), 174-174.
6. Rajabipourmibadi, A, Hosseini, E, Ajrlou, F, Analysis of the effect of de-learning components in the organization on human resource development, Quarterly Journal of Human Resources Education and Development, (2018), 5 (17), 137-157 .
7. Ruíz, M. D. A., Gutiérrez, J. O., Martínez-Caro, E., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. Linking an unlearning context with firm performance through human capital. European Research on Management and Business Economics, (2017), 23(1), 16-22.
8. Taatila, V., & Down, S. Measuring entrepreneurial orientation of university students. Education+ training, (2012).
9. Palme, U. Good examples of education for sustainable development at chalmers: achievements and limitations, paper presented at engineering education in sustainable development, Go¨teborg, September, (2012), 19-22.
10. Goodarzvand Chegini, M, The approach of fourth generation universities of work and practice (Case study: Cambridge, Stanford and Harvard universities), Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, (2018), 20 (78), 1-16.
11. Wang, X., Xi, Y., Xie, J., & Zhao, Y. Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&A: the roles of routine and knowledge compatibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, (2017).
12. Hislop, D., Bosley, S., Coombs, C. R., & Holland, J. The process of individual unlearning: A neglected topic in an under-researched field. Management Learning, (2014), 45(5), 540-560.
13. Matsuo, M. Managers’ exploration activities and individual unlearning: The mediating role of learning orientation and reflection. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, (2020), 31(5), 638-656.
14. Kmieciak, R. Critical reflection and innovative work behavior: the mediating role of individual unlearning. Personnel Review, (2020).
15. Rebernik, M., & Širec, K. Fostering innovation by unlearning tacit knowledge. Kybernetes, (2007).
16. Wensley, A. K., & Navarro, J. G. C. Overcoming knowledge loss through the utilization of an unlearning context. Journal of Business Research, (2015), 68(7), 1563-1569.
17. Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., & Keskin, H. Organizational unlearning as changes in beliefs and routines in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management(2007).
18. Becker, K. Individual and organisational unlearning: directions for future research. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, (2005), 9(7), 659-670.
19. Tsang, E. W., & Zahra, S. A. Organizational unlearning. Human relations, (2008), 61(10), 1435-1462.
20. Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., & Wensley, APromoting intentional unlearning through an unlearning cycle. Journal of Organizational Change Management, (2019).
21. Cepeda-Carrión, I., Leal-Millán, A. G., Ortega-Gutierrez, J., & Leal-Rodriguez, A. L. Linking unlearning with service quality through learning processes in the Spanish banking industry. Journal of Business Research, (2015), 68(7), 1450-1457.
22. Zhao, Y., Lu, Y., & Wang, X. Organizational unlearning and organizational relearning: a dynamic process of knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management, (2013).
23. Wang, H. C., He, J., & Mahoney, J. T. Firm‐specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: the roles of economic‐and relationship‐based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic management journal, (2019), 30(12), 1265-1285.
24. MacIntosh, E. W., & Doherty, A. The influence of organizational culture on job satisfaction and intention to leave. Sport Management Review, (2010), 13(2), 106-117.
25. Delshab, V., Kerwin, S., & Cegarra-Navarro, J. G. The impact of unlearning context on organizational performance through knowledge management: A case of community sport clubs in Iran. Sport Management Review, (2020).
26. Mattes, J., Huber, A., & Koehrsen, J. Energy transitions in small-scale regions–What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective. Energy Policy, (2015), 78, 255-264.
27. Dubouloz, S. Organizational innovation: clarifying the concept as output and as process and suggesting research avenues from these two angles of analysis. AIMS (Association Internationale de Managment Strategique). Lille France, (2012).
28. Albury, D. Fostering innovation in public services. Public money and management, (2005), 25(1), 51-56.
29. Guisado-González, M., González-Blanco, J., & Coca-Pérez, J. L. Analyzing the relationship between exploration, exploitation and organizational innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, (2017).
30. Fu, Y., Liu, R., Yang, J., Jiao, H., & Jin, Y. “Lean in”: the moderating effect of female ownership on the relationship between human capital and organizational innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2020).
31. Boroujerdi, S. S., Hasani, K., & Delshab, V. Investigating the influence of knowledge management on organizational innovation in higher educational institutions. Kybernetes, (2019).
32. Arciénaga Morales, A. A., Nielsen, J., Bacarini, H. A., Martinelli, S. I., Kofuji, S. T., & García Díaz, J. F. Technology and innovation management in higher education—Cases from Latin America and Europe. Administrative Sciences, (2018), 8(2), 11.
33. Brennan, J., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., Kamphuis, B., Ranga, M., & Ryan, S. Study on innovation in higher education, (2014).
34. Ginesti, G., Caldarelli, A., & Zampella, A. Exploring the impact of intellectual capital on company reputation and performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2018).
35. Lerro, A., Linzalone, R., & Schiuma, G. Managing intellectual capital dimensions for organizational value creation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2014).
36. Tsang, E. W. Stop eulogizing, complicating or straitjacketing the concept of organizational unlearning, please. The Learning Organization, (2017).
37. Romer, P. M. Endogenous technological change. Journal of political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), (1990), S71-S102.
38. Murray, A., Papa, A., Cuozzo, B., Russo, G., Al-Mashari, M., & Del Giudice, M. Evaluating the innovation of the Internet of Things: Empirical evidence from the intellectual capital assessment. Business Process Management Journal, (2016).
39. Dezi, L., Ferraris, A., Papa, A., & Vrontis, D. The role of external embeddedness and knowledge management as antecedents of ambidexterity and performances in Italian SMEs. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (2019).
40. Passaro, R., Quinto, I., & Thomas, A. The impact of higher education on entrepreneurial intention and human capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, (2018).
41. Scuotto, V., Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Del Giudice, M. Shifting intra‐and inter‐organizational innovation processes towards digital business: an empirical analysis of SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, (2017), 26(3), 247-255.
42. Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. How strategic knowledge management drives intellectual capital to superior innovation and market performance. Journal of knowledge management, (2018).
43. Jiao, H., Alon, I., Koo, C. K., & Cui, Y. When should organizational change be implemented? The moderating effect of environmental dynamism between dynamic capabilities and new venture performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, (2013), 30(2), 188-205.
44. Klammer, A., & Gueldenberg, S. Honor the old, welcome the new: an account of unlearning and forgetting in NPD teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, (2019).
45. Ekawati, R., & Soleha, L. K. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Inovasi Organisasi Melalui Human Capital. Jurnal INTEKNA, (2017), 12(2), 79-147.
46. Avizeh, M, Investigating the effect of organizational detoxification on company performance with the mediating role of human capital (Case study: Shiraz Shamsham Food Industries Company), M.Sc. Thesis, Marvdasht Branch of Azad University. Supervisor, Mansour Aminilari, (2018).
47. Davari, A, Rezazadeh, A. Structural Equation Modeling with PLS Software, Second Edition, Jihad Daneshgahi Publications, Tehran, (2014).
48. Hair, J. J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications, (2017).
49. Vicente-Saez, R., Gustafsson, R., & Van den Brande, L. The dawn of an open exploration era: Emergent principles and practices of open science and innovation of university research teams in a digital world. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (2020), 156, 120037.
50. Schultz, T. W. Investment in human capital. The American economic review, (1961), 51(1), 1-17.
51. Bedford, T., Kinnaird, Y., Migueis, R., Paolucci, E., Vos, A., Wijlands, B. Role of Universities of Science and Technology in Innovation Ecosystems: Towards Mission 3.1)2018(.
52. Ayris, P., López de San Román, A., Maes, K., & Labastida, I. Open Science and its role in universities: A roadmap for cultural change. Leuven: LERU Office. Retrieved December, (2018), 13, 2019.
53. Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Eldridge, S., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Millán, A. G., & Ortega-Gutiérrez, J. Organizational unlearning, innovation outcomes, and performance: The moderating effect of firm size. Journal of Business Research, (2015), 68(4), 803-809.
54. Hoseini, M. H., Norouzi Ajirloo, R., & Azizi, I. Preparing the Background of the Organizational Forgetting and Its Role in Improving the Performance of Emergency Bases Through Human Capital. Health in Emergencies and Disasters, (2019), 4(4), 217-228.
55. Ivascu, L., Cirjaliu, B., & Draghici, A. Business model for the university-industry collaboration in open innovation. Procedia Economics and Finance, (2016), 39, 674-678.