Determining Performance Coaching Indices and Developing a Coaching Model for Managers in the Petrochemical Industry
Subject Areas :
Omid Ali
Mashodi
1
(Associate Professor, Department of Communication, Faculty of Culture and Communication, Soura University, Tehran, Iran)
Hassan
Darzian Rostami
2
(Assistant Professor, Department of Communication and Media Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, Communication and Media, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Iran)
Hadi
Zeraatpisheh
3
(دانشجوی دکتری مديريت ارتباطات، گروه علوم ارتباطات و رسانه، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، ارتباطات و رسانه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تهران مرکز، ايران .)
Keywords: Coaching, Performance Coaching, Coaching Indices, Coaching Dimensions, Performance.,
Abstract :
The present study aimed to develop a model for performance coaching indices for public relations managers of petrochemical companies in the South Pars region. This applied study used exploratory content analysis to form categories including dimensions, components, and behavioral indices. A mixed-methods approach was used for data collection and analysis. In the qualitative phase, data were collected via interviews with experts in the field of coaching. The data collected in the qualitative phase were analyzed using content analysis of texts, interviews, and questionnaires with a Delphi approach. In the quantitative phase, data were collected via surveys with the network pairwise comparison questionnaire and the standard ACHIEVE performance measurement questionnaire. Twenty experts were recruited for the qualitative phase and 160 public relations managers for the quantitative phase. The results of the research showed that experts agreed on three individual, social, and organizational dimensions by consensus. Experts agreed on the indices obtained from the review of literature and interviews, which included eight individual indices, six social indices, and five organizational indices. Organizational dimension had the highest effect on performance management with a path coefficient of 4.6, followed by the individual dimension with a path coefficient of 2.55, and the social dimension with a path coefficient of 2.46. Based on path coefficient analysis in structural equations, the priority of indices (path coefficient) in the individual dimension was as follows: behavior and character (9.36), media literacy (2.33), cognitive intelligence and empowerment (7.25), personality (5.19), and accountability (8.9). The priority of indices for the social dimension was as follows: communication skills (4.28), status and position (3.26), participation (2.24), dynamism (5.19), altruism (3.17), and team planning (1.14). The obtained indices were tested for their relationship with performance components based on the ACHIEVE model. The test results showed that the path coefficients of individual, social and organizational dimensions on performance management were 0.190, 0.267, and 0.397, respectively. This means that the factors have a positive and significant effect on performance management and the developed model is approved.
1. Ahanchiyan, Mohammadreza . “Strategic Management ".2018. Development and improvement of managers and leaders in educational organizations. Tehran: Roshd Publisher
2. Dehghan, Alireza, Public Relations Theories, Office of Media Studies and Development. 2009. Tehran.
3. R ,Brigitta . Brunner (Ed.Public), Relations Theory: Application and Understanding. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, 2019. 272 pp
4. Whitmore J.Coaching for performance . 2018 .London: UK: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
5. The American Heritage Dictionary. Wwww. american heritage dictionary.
6. McGettigan, Kathleen. Implementing FCAT-M Performance Management Competencies.Performance Coaching and Feedback. www.opm.Gov. (2020).
7. https://hawkhummingbird.com/team-member/roisin-ro-mcgettigan-dumas-ma
8. Grant, e. takes time: Steps to change perspectives on workplace management skills. Journal of Change Management 9.. (2010); 10 (1):61-77
9. Parselow, E. & Wray M. Coaching and mentoring: practical methods to improve learning. (2000). Kogan page, landan
10. Lai ,Yi-Ling, Palmer Stephen .Introduction to Coaching Psychology. Routledge (2021).
11. McKinney Christy M , Somnath Mookherjee , Stephan D Fihn , Gallagher, Thomas H . An Academic Research Coach: An Innovative Approach to Increasing Scholarly Productivity in Medicine.2019 Aug 1;14(8):457-461
12. Rafati, M. Mousakhani, M. Zabihi, M. Ghorbani. M. Designing an Organizational Coaching Model for Public Organizations: An Organizational Soft Productivity Approach. The Journal of Productivity Management, 2021; 15(1(56) Spring): 77-106. doi: 10.30495/qjopm.2020.1875757.2581
13. Bolouki Korandeh, M. Amir Kabiri, A. Jamshidi, M. The coaching model of banking managers. Journal of Human Resource Management, 2020; 10(4): 43-64. doi: 10.22034/jhrs.2021.245249.1473
14. SOTUDEH ALI, JAAFARI PARIVASH, MOHAMMAD DAVOUDI AMIR HOSSEIN. Developing a Performance Coaching Competency Model for Supervisors & Managers of NIOC. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT IN THE OIL INDUSTRY. 2020 [cited 2021November18];12(45 ):237-263. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=814229
15. Hair. J. F. Sarstedt, M. Ringle, C. M. & Mena, J. A.. An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing Research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2017. 40(3): 414-433.
16. Barclay, D. Higgins, C. & Thompson, R. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, technological studies.1995; 2(2): 285-309