طراحی مدل معادلات ساختاری تأثیر صداقت بر قابلیت اعتماد مربی: نقش تعدیلکننده ویژگیهای شاگرد
محورهای موضوعی : روش های نوین آموزش وتوسعه منابع انسانیMaryam Farhadi 1 * , قنبر محمدی الیاسی 2 , سید رضا سیدجوادین 3 , مجتبی امیری 4
1 - گروه مدیریت منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 - گروه توسعه کارآفرینی، دانشکده کارآفرینی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 - گروه منابع انسانی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
4 - گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
کلید واژه: مربیگری, قابل اعتماد بودن, صداقت, تمایل به اعتماد, اشتیاق به یادگیری,
چکیده مقاله :
یکی از عوامل موثر در اعتماد بین مدیر وکارمند صداقت مدیر است. با این حال، مطالعات کمی تأثیر صداقت در رابطه مربیگری را مورد بررسی قرار دادهاند. هدف این مقاله بررسی نقش صداقت مربی و تأثیر تعدیل کننده سه متغیر تمایل به اعتماد، اشتیاق به یادگیری و پشتکار شاگرد بود. روش تحقیق از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی و از نوع معادلات ساختاری بود. نمونه آماری 365 نفر تعیین شد. از ابزار پرسشنامه استفاده شد که پایایی این ابزار با محاسبه آلفای کرونباخ 92 درصد به دست آمد. داده ها با نرم افزار Amos و با روش احتمال حداکثر مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که تغییرات در اعتماد شاگرد نسبت به مربی از طریق صداقت مدیر قابل تبیین است. علاوه بر این، از میان ویژگیهای شاگرد، تنها تأثیر اشتیاق به یادگیری بر قابلیت اعتماد مربی نسبت به مربی از نظر آماری معنیدار بود. این پژوهش با در نظر گرفتن نقش اشتیاق به یادگیری به عنوان تعدیل کننده صداقت مربی، یک مدل معادلات ساختاری جدید از تأثیر صداقت بر قابلیت اعتماد مربی را ارائه میکند. ارزش این تحقیق ایجاد آگاهی در بین مدیران ارشد و سرپرستان شغلی سازمان برای توجه بیشتر به اهمیت ایجاد اعتماد در کارکنان خود است.
One of the effective factors in the trustworthiness between manager and employee is the integrity of the manager. However, few studies have examined the effect of integrity in the mentoring relationship. The purpose of this article was to investigate the role of mentor integrity by studying the moderating effect of three variables: willingness to trust, eagerness to learn, and grit of the mentee. The research method was based on descriptive-correlation and structural equations type. Its statistical sample was determined 365 people. Moreover, a questionnaire tool was used, and the reliability of this tool was 92% by calculating Cronbach's alpha. The data was analyzed with Amos software and the maximum likelihood method. The results showed that the changes in the mentee's trustworthiness towards the mentor can be explained through the integrity of the manager. Furthermore, among the characteristics of the mentee, the effect of eagerness to learn on the trustworthiness of the mentee towards the mentor was statistically significant. This research presents a new structural equation model of the effect of integrity on the mentor trustworthiness with considering the role of eager to learn as moderating of mentor’s integrity. The value of this research is creating awareness among senior managers and job supervisors in the organization to pay more attention to the importance of building trustworthiness in their employees.
1. Lleo de Nalda A, Guillen M, Gil Pechuan I. The influence of ability, benevolence, and integrity in trust between managers and employees: the role of ethical reasoning: Business Ethics. A European Review. 2016;25(4):556-76.
2. Shen M, Tzioumis E, Andersen E, Wouk K, McCall RL, Malloy E. Impact of mentoring on academic career success for women in medicine: a systematic review. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2022;9(3):444-58.
3. Roberts L, Ferro-Almeida S. Is trustworthiness important in a doctoral mentor? Toward a theory of tough love mentoring. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2019;14:613-35.
4. Lewicki R, McAllister D, Bies R. Trust and distrust: new relationships and realities. The Academy of management review. 1998;23(3):438-58.
5. Mayer R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of management review. 1995;20(3):709-38.
6. Pearlin L, Menaghan E, Lieberman M, Mullan J. The stress process. Journal of Health Social behavior. 1981;22(4):337-56.
7. Simons T, Leroy H, Nishii L. Revisiting Behavioral Integrity: Progress and New Directions After 20 Years. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology Organizational Behavior. 2022;17:365-89.
8. Kaiser RB, Hogan R. How to (and how not to) assess the integrity of managers. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 2010;62(4):216-34.
9. Parry K, Proctor-Thomson S. Perceived Integrity of Transformational Leaders in Organisational Settings. Journal of Business Ethics. 2002;35:75-96.
10. Way SA, Simons T, Leroy H, Tuleja EA. What is in it for me? Middle manager behavioral integrity and performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2018;150(3):765-77.
11. Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2002 87(4):765-80.
12. Peng H, Wei F. How and when does leader behavioral integrity influence employee voice? The roles of team independence climate and corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020;166(3):505-21.
13. Duckworth A. Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. Scribner New York: NY, 2016.
14. Sanfey H, Hollands C, Gantt N. Strategies for building an effective mentoring relationship. American journal of surgery. 2013;206:714-8.
15. Royal M. Mentee and mentor traits for establishing and sustaining mentorship: pesperctives from the South African sugar industry. Research Journal of Educational Sciences. 2016;4(2):1-6.
16. Rotter J. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American psychologist. 1971;26(5):443.
17. Christopoulou M, Lakioti A, Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Stalikas A. The Role of Grit in Education: A Systematic Review. Psychology. 2018;9:2951-71.
18. Reed LJ. Student grit as an important ingredient for academic and personal success. . Paper presented at the Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL conference. 2007.
19. Johnson B, DePodwin R, Rennie J, Cook AR, Sealls A, Wood KM, et al. The Early Career Leadership Academy: Beyond Leadership into Mentorship. Paper presented at the 99th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting. 2020.
20. Kram K. Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organisational Life. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1985;30.
21. Mullen C, Fitzhugh G, Hobson A. District-wide mentoring: using Kram’s model to support educators. Kappa delta pi record. 2022;58(1):26-31.
22. Ghosh R, Murphy W, Cotton R, Kram K. Seeking Support from Multiple Developers: Assessing Optimal Structure, Content, Antecedents, and Outcomes of Developmental Networks. . HRD Perspectives on Developmental Relationships: Springer. 2022. p. 467-99.
23. Borchert A, Heisel M. The Role of Trustworthiness Facets for Developing Social Media Applications: A Structured Literature Review. Information. 2022;13(1):34.
24. Whitener EM, Brodt SE, Korsgaard MA, Werner JM. Managers as initiators of trust: an exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review. 1998;23(3):513-30.
25. John K, Butler JR. Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management. 1991; 17:643-63.
26. Clark MC, Payne RL. The nature and structure of workers' trust in management. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1997;18(3): 205-24.
27. Ferres N, Connell J, Travaglione A. Co-worker trust as a social catalyst for constructive employee attitudes. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2004;19(6):608-22.
28. McAllister DJ. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal. 1995;38(1):24-59.
29. Schoorman FD, Mayer RC, Davis JH. Empowerment in veterinary clinics: the role of trust in delegation. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA. 1996.
30. Knoll D, Gill H. Antecedents of trust in supervisors, employees, and peers. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2011;62(4):313-30.
31. Masters A. Integrity. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Public Management. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2022.
32. Davis A, Rothstein H. The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. 2006;67(4):407-19.
33. Knoll DL. The relative importance of ability, benevolence, and integrity in predicting supervisor, employee, and peer trust. The University of Guelph. 2007.
34. Kee HW, Knox RE. Conceptual and methodological considerations in the study of trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1970;14(3):357-66.
35. Jin L, Xu Q, Wang Y, Zhang Y. The divergent impact of reward magnitude on goal eagerness and effort investment. Organizational behavior human decision processes. 2021;167:101-13.
36. Brodie J, Van Saane SH, Osowska R. Help wanted: Exploring the value of entrepreneurial mentoring at start-up. Industry Higher Education. 2017;32(1):122-31.
37. Leck J, Orser B. Fostering trust in mentoring relationships: An exploratory study. Equality, diversity inclusion. An international journal. 2013;32: 410-25.
38. Zerzan JT, Hess R, Schur E, Phillips RS, Rigotti N. Making the most of mentors: a guide for mentees. Academic Medicine. 2009;84(1): 140-4.
39. J. F. Mentorship: excellence in the mundane. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants. 2013;7(3):142-4.
40. Hubbard K. Psychologists as testers. In: Hare D, Hall, J., Pilgrim, D., Turpin, G., editor. Clinical Psychology in Britain: Historical Perspectives. British Psychology Society: Leicester: Blackwell; 2015.
41. Allen T, Poteet M. Developing effective mentoring relationships: Strategies from the mentor's viewpoint. The career development quarterly.48(1):58-79.
42. Roberts L.R. The validation of using assessment tools and a theory to mentor doctoral students with integrity and trustworthiness. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2020;15:30-56.
43. Colquitt J, George G. Publishing in AMJ-part 1: topic choice. NY: Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor; 2011.
44. Firmansyah MR, Amelia R, Jamil RA, Faturochman FF, Minza WM. Benevolence, competency, and integrity: Which is more influential on trust in friendships? Jurnal Psikologi. 2019;18(1):91-105.
45. Svare H, Gausdal AH, Möllering G. The function of ability, benevolence, and integrity-based trust in innovation networks. Industry Innovation. 2020;27(6):585-604.
46. Levin D, Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management science. 2004;50(11):1477-90.
47. McKnight H, Cummings L, Chervany N. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of management review. 1998;23(4):437-90.
48. Yip J, Walker DOH. Leaders mentoring others: The effects of implicit followership theory on leader integrity and mentoring. The international journal of human resource management advance online publication. 2021.
49. Baer M, Matta F, Kim K, Welsh D, Garud N. It's not you, it's them: Social influences on trust willingnessand trust dynamics. Personnel psychology. 2018;71(3): 423-55.
50. Ali H, Birley S. The role of trust in the marketing activities of entrepreneurs establishing new ventures. Journal of Marketing Management. 1998;14(7):749-63.
51. Maini A, Saravanan Y, Singh T, Fyfe M. Coaching skills for medical education in a VUCA world. Medical Teacher. 2020;42(11):1308-9.
52. Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR. Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of personality and social psychology. 2007;92:1087-101.
53. Kohn A. Grit? A skeptical look at the latest educational fad. Journal of independent school. 2014;74(1):104-8.
54. Madden J. Relationships of principal grit, teacher trust in the principal, and faculty organizational commitment in Alabama public high schools. The University of Alabama, 2015