شناسایی عوامل و راهکارهای مؤثر بر موفقیت برنامه های توسعه و بهسازی اعضای هیئت علمی
محورهای موضوعی : روش های نوین آموزش وتوسعه منابع انسانی
محمد تقی رودی
1
(دانش آموخته دکترای مطالعات برنامه درسی، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.)
کلید واژه: آموزش عالی, برنامه های توسعه هیئت علمی, توسعه و بهسازی, دانشگاه.,
چکیده مقاله :
مطالعه عوامل و راهکارهای مؤثر بر موفقیت برنامه های توسعه و بهسازی اعضای هیئت علمی، می تواند بر اثربخشی بیشتر این برنامه ها و بهبود کیفیت خدمات آموزش عالی تأثیر گذار باشد. در همین راستا، هدف این پژوهش شناسایی عوامل و راهکارهای مؤثر بر موفقیت برنامه¬های توسعه و بهسازی اعضای هیئت علمی می باشد. پژوهش حاضر با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی انجام شده است. شرکت کنندگان پژوهش اعضای هیئت علمی دانشگاه ها و مؤسسات آموزش عالی شهر تهران بودند که 15 نفر برای انجام مصاحبه نیمه ساختاریافته انتخاب شدند. روش انتخاب مشارکت کنندگان، نمونه گیری هدفمند و از نوع ملاکی بود. برای تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات نیز روش تحلیل مضمون استفاده شده است. با توجه به یافته های پژوهش، 6 عامل مؤثر و 20 راهکار شناسایی شد که عبارتند از: عامل زمینه و بسترسازی (شامل: فراهم نمودن امکانات، ایجاد و تقویت مراکز بالندگی، اقناع مدیران و جلب مشارکت اساتید)، عامل برنامه ریزی (شامل: تعدیل حجم کاری اساتید، احیا و تقویت انواع روش های، استفاده از انواع روش های ارائه آموزش و زمانبندی)، عامل محتوا (شامل: ارائه محتوای کاربردی، ارتباط عناوین آموزشی و آیین نامه ارتقا و توسعه همه-جانبه) عامل ارتباط و همکاری (شامل: ایجاد شیکه های یادگیری، ایجاد فرصت همکاری و مشارکت و بهبود ارتباط برنامه ریزان و اساتید)، عامل انگیزه توسعه (شامل: حقوق و دستمزد، ارائه مشوق های آموزش و توسعه و اقناع اساتید)، عامل حمایت و پیگیری (شامل: حمایت از آموزش در عمل، استمرار برنامه های توسعه و ارزیابی). توجه به عوامل مؤثر بر موفقیت این برنامه ها و بهره برداری از راهکارهای ارائه شده در پژوهش حاضر بر اثربخشی برنامه های توسعه و بهسازی تأثیر گذار خواهد بود.
Investigating factors and solutions that affect development and improvement programs for faculty members could influence the effectiveness of these programs and improve the quality of higher education services. Therefore, the aim of this research is to identify the effective factors and solutions that play an important role in development and improvement programs of faculty members. The present research was conducted with the qualitative content analysis method. The research participants included faculty members of universities and higher education institutions in Tehran and 15 individuals were selected as the study sample and semi-structured interviews were conducted. The participants were selected by purposeful and criterion sampling and the data were analyzed with Thematic analysis method. According to the findings of the research, 6 effective factors and 20 solutions were identified, including: background factor (including: providing facilities, creating and strengthening growth centers, persuading managers and attracting professors' participation), planning factor (including: adjusting the workload of professors, revitalizing and strengthening all kinds of methods, using all kinds of teaching delivery methods and scheduling), the content factor (including: providing practical content, the communication of educational topics and the regulation of all-round promotion and development) the communication factor and cooperation (including: creating learning styles, creating opportunities for cooperation and participation, and improving communication between planners and professors), motivational factor for development (including: salaries and wages, providing training and development incentives and persuading professors), support factor and follow-up (including: supporting training in practice, continuity of development and evaluation programs). Attending to the factors which determine the level of success for these programs and using the solutions presented in the current research could lead to higher effectiveness and improvement of the programs.
1. Ghorooneh, D., Mirkamali, S. M., Bazargan, A., & Kharazi, S. K. A model for faculty development at the University of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2017; 22(3), 1-17. [In Persian]
2. Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education (IRPHE). Statistics of higher education in Iran: academy year 2012 – 2013. Department of statistics information technology. 2012.
3. Salehisadr, S., Rezaiefar, H., Mohammadi, M., & Hakimpour, H. Presentation the development model of faculty members with a virtualization approach (Islamic Azad University of the Khorasan Razavi Province). Educational Leadership & administration. 2021; 15(3), 1-28.
4. Roshani Ali Benasee, H., Hassani, M., & Ghalavandi, H. Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Research Development for Designing a Conceptual Model (Case Study: Faculty Members of Urmia University). Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System. 2021; 14(2), 169-196. doi: 10.52547/MPES.14.2.169.
5. Rahimi Kinchaa, D ., Abbaspour, A., Taheri, M., Zarei Zavaraki, E., & Khorsandi Taskouh, A. Challenges of professional development of faculty members of Allameh Tabataba'i University in online teaching. Journal of Technology of Education (Journal of Technology and Education). 2021; 15(3 (59)), 479-490. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/375014/fa.
6. Homayeni Damirchi, A., Mahjob Eshratabadi, H., Mehri, D., & Vosoghi-Niri, A. The Evaluation of the Academic Development of Faculty Members of University and Proposing Suitable Strategies for Its Enhancement (Case Study; A Military University). Military Management Quarterly. 2016; 16(61), 29-59.
7. Eshraghi Samani, R. Factors Affecting the Professional Development of Faculty Members: A Case Study of Ilam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran, International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics. 2017; 7(4), August.
8. Ghasemi, & Salehi, K. Representing the Obstacles and Challenges in Growth and Empowerment of Newly-hired Faculty Members: A Phenomenological study. Journal of Training and Development of Human Resource. 2017; 4(13), 1-25. https://www.sid.ir/paper/255615/fa.
9. Emery, N., Maher, J. M., & Ebert-May, D. Studying Professional Development as Part of the Complex Ecosystem of STEM Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education. 2019; 44(6), 469-479.
10. Dar, Sibtah; Jabeen, ; Jadoon, Zafar Iqbal; Dar, Irum Sajjad. Faculty Development Programs and Their Effect on Individual and Organizational Performance in Pakistan, Pakistan Vision. 2016; Volume 18, Issue No 2.
11. Algahtani H, Shirah B, Aldarmahi A, Alshawwa L, Tekian A, Norcini J. Barriers to Faculty Development Program for Medical Education: Experience from Saudi Arabia. Dr. Sulaiman Al Habib Medical Journal. 2020; 2(3):101-5. https:// dx.doi.org/10.2991/dsahmj.k.200515.001.
12. Seyyed Hatami S S, Namvar Y, Soleimani T, Zahed Babolan A. Faculty Members Development Model at Farhangian University with Grounded Theory Approach. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2023; 16 (2) :124-134.
13. Burgess A, Matar E, Neuen B, Fox GJ. A longitudinal faculty development program: Supporting a culture of teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19:400.
14. Mahajan R, Singh T. Impact of Faculty Development Program on Teachers’ Development. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci. Published online. 2021:4-5. doi:10.1055/s-0041-1731595.
15. Vathulya M, Rao S, Kathrotia R, Naithani M, Bisht M, Varshney S, et al. Factors influencing the success of faculty development programme: Our experience and future recommendations. J Med Evid. 2021; 2:125-33.
16. Rowbotham M. The Impact of Faculty Development on Teacher Self-Efficacy. Skills and Perspectives (faculty fellow report). 2015.
17. Rahman MH. Faculty development programs (FDP) in developing professional efficacy: A comparative study among participants and non-participants of FDP in Bangladesh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023 Jan 1; 7(1):100499.
18. Burkle M, Rolfson D, and Lang M. Designing an International Faculty Development Program in Medical Education: Capacity and Partnership. International Medical Education. 2023 Jan 27;2(1):26-34.
19. Frantz JM, Bezuidenhout J, Burch VC, Mthembu S, Rowe M, Tan C, Van Wyk J, Van Heerden B. The impact of a faculty development programme for health professions educators in sub-Saharan Africa: an archival study. BMC medical education. 2015 Dec; 15(1):1-8.
20. Layne J, Froyd J, Simpson N, Caso R, Merton P. Understanding and improving faculty professional development in teaching. In34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. 2004 Oct 20 (pp. S1C-15). IEEE.
21. Hoyt S, Mayled LH, Krause SJ, Hjelmstad KD, Hjelmstad KL, Honeycutt CF, Judson E, Ross L, Middleton JA, Culbertson RJ, Liu K. Extending faculty development through a sustainable community of practice. In2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access 2020 Jun 22.
22. Guraya SY, Chen S. The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2019 May 1; 26(4):688-97.
23. Ghasemi, S., Bazrafkan, L., Shojaei, A., Rakhshani, T., & Shokrpour, N. Faculty development strategies to empower university teachers by their educational role: A qualitative study on the faculty members and students' experiences at Iranian universities of medical sciences. BMC medical education. 2023; 23(1), 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04209-0.
24. Shambaugh N. Applying a teaching decision cycle to the design of online learning within faculty professional development. InResearch Anthology on Remote Teaching and Learning and the Future of Online Education 2023 (pp. 598-616). IGI Global.
25. Karaminezhad, N., Ghasemizad, A., & Motamed, H. Provide a model of lived experience of university faculty members of professional development based on soft educational skills. Educational Leadership & administration. 2022; 15(4), 119-148.
26. Bandali, Bahar, Abolghasemi, Mahmood, Pardakhtchi, MohammadHassan, & Rezaeizadeh, Morteza. Studying the Challenges of Faculty Development Programs at Shahid Beheshti University. Journal of training and development of human resources. 2018; 5(), 25-53. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/255552/.
27. Misky GJ, Sharpe B, Weaver AC, Niranjan-Azadi A, Gupta A, Rennke S, Ludwin S, Piper C, MLIS, Sun VK, Brotman DJ. Faculty Development in Academic Hospital Medicine: a Scoping Review. Journal of general internal medicine. 2023 Mar 6:1-7.
28. Shakoor A, Farooqi MT. Review of Factors Contributing in Faculty Development Program of Pakistani Universities. Journal of Educational Sciences & Research. 2020 Mar 1; 7(1).
29. Assadullahi F, Shakeri M, Barzegar Bafrooei K. The Process of Forming Professional Development Challenges for Faculty Members of Ghazni University, Afghanistan. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education. 2019 Aug 1; 2(3):362-82.
30. khoshnam, M. Qualitative content analysis of upstream documents of science and technology centers. Rahyaft. 2021; 31(83), 57-62. doi: 10.22034/rahyaft.2022.11055.1306.
31. Iman, Mohammad Taghi, Noshadi, Mahmoudreza. Qualitative content analysis. Research. 2011; 3 (2): 15-41.
32. Shava GN, Hleza S, Tlou F, Shonhiwa S, Mathonsi E. Qualitative content analysis utility, usability and processes in educational research. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2021; 5(7):553-8.
33. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006 Jan 1; 3(2):77-101.
34. Norman AS, King RJ. Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative. Journal of Development Education. 2020; 44(1):26-8.
35. Baran E, Bilici S, Mesutoglu C, Ocak C. Moving STEM beyond schools: Students' perceptions about an out-of-school STEM education program. International Journal of Education in Mathematics Science and Technology. 2016; 4(1).
36. Kim DH, Lee JH, Park J, Shin JS. Process-oriented evaluation of an international faculty development program for Asian developing countries: a qualitative study. BMC medical education. 2017 Dec; 17(1):1-3.
37. Sharma S. An Investigation into Effective Strategies for Faculty Evaluation and Development in Educational Institutions. Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology. 2023 Sep 20;44(3):642-7.
38. Brown, Karin. Building bridges, not admiring from afar. How Swiss faculty developers create disciplinary relevance for generic pedagogy. SFDN 2023 CONFERENCE: Going further together. 24th November 2023
39. Phuong TT, McLean GN. The experiences of Vietnamese university faculty in relation to their faculty development. Asia Pacific Education Review. 2016 Dec; 17:599-608.
40. Azizi, N. A Study of Ways to Improve Research Performance of Humanities Faculty Members. Strategy for culture letter. 2013; 6(21), 7-33.