طراحی و اعتبارسنجی الگوی آموزش اثربخش رؤسای زندانهای کشور: پژوهشی آمیخته
محورهای موضوعی : روش های نوین آموزش وتوسعه منابع انسانی
محسن شمس
1
,
جواد کیهان
2
*
,
ابراهیم صالحی عمران
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری گروه علمی حکمرانی آموزشی و سرمایه انسانی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه. ایران.
2 - دانشیار گروه مطالعات تربیتی و برنامه ریزی درسی، واحد ارومیه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ارومیه، ایران
3 - استاد گروه علوم تربيتي، دانشكده علوم انساني و اجتماعي، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ايران
کلید واژه: آموزش اثربخش, رؤسای زندانها, نظریه دادهبنیاد, مدلسازی ساختاری ـ تفسیری,
چکیده مقاله :
This study aimed to develop a context-sensitive and locally grounded model for the effective training of prison wardens in the Islamic Republic of Iran. In terms of purpose, the study was applied-developmental, and methodologically, it employed an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, systematic grounded theory, following the Corbin and Strauss approach, was used. The participants comprised 21 experts, including nine university academics and 12 senior prison administrators or experienced prison wardens, who were selected through purposive and theoretical sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding. The trustworthiness of the findings was established through member checking and an assessment of coding stability. In the second phase, the same 21 experts evaluated the pairwise relationships among the components identified in the qualitative phase. Interpretive Structural Modeling was subsequently employed to determine the interrelationships and hierarchical levels of the components, while MICMAC analysis was used to examine their driving power and dependence. The qualitative analysis yielded 628 initial codes, 108 concepts, and 29 main and subcategories. Based on the paradigmatic model, deficiencies in the existing training system, the gap between professional knowledge and practical skills, and the absence of an effective evaluation system emerged as major factors influencing the training of prison wardens. The final model organized the identified categories into causal conditions, the central phenomenon, contextual and intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences. The results of the structural analysis further indicated that trainer competence, the use of educational technologies, and managerial motivation possessed strong driving power and played a foundational role in shaping and enhancing the effectiveness of the training system. The findings suggest that effective training for prison wardens requires an integrated, competency-based system aligned with the professional and organizational realities of prison administration. The proposed model may provide a practical framework for redesigning training policies, programmers, and processes, improving managerial decision-making and performance, and advancing the correctional and rehabilitative objectives of the prison system.
This study is developmental-applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of method with a grounded theory strategy in the systematic method of Strauss and Corbin (2015 edition). The participants included 21 experts in the fields of prison management, penal policymaking, human resource training, and experienced managers of prison organizations who were selected using purposive sampling and snowball technique. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview, and data analysis was conducted in three stages of open, axial, and selective coding. The participant matching method, conceptual convergence analysis, and feedback review were used to validate the findings. In order to enhance the structural robustness of the model and analyze the relationship between components, interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and impact-dependency analysis (MICMAC) were used. The findings led to the identification of 628 open codes, 108 central codes, and 29 selected codes. Based on the paradigmatic model, the weakness of the existing education system, the knowledge and skills gap, and the absence of effective evaluation were identified as the main challenges. The final model presented, from a multi-level perspective, organizes causal, contextual, interventionist, strategic, and outcome elements in an integrated and native model. In the ISM analysis, variables such as the ability of instructors, the use of educational technology, and the motivation of managers were included among the variables with high influence that play a key role in activating and guiding the education system.
[1] Stojkovic S. Administration and management in criminal justice: A service quality approach. 3rd ed. Waveland Press; 2019.
[2] Anishchenko VO, Sharapova Y, Leonenko O, Sorokopud VB, Kyriienko A. Building professional competence of prison staff: Psychological, pedagogical, and legal aspects. Int J Stat Med Res. 2024;13. doi:10.6000/1929-6029.2024.13.29.
[3] Ahmed U, Kyle C, de Ribera OS, Trajtenberg Pareja N. Leadership and Prison Violence. InPrisoner Leaders: Leadership as Experience and Institution 2025 Jan 31 (pp. 21-51). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
[4] Sanchez-Lastra MA, de Dios Álvarez V, Ayán Pérez C. Effectiveness of prison-based exercise training programs: A systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2019;16(12):1196–1209.
[5] Petrovska M, Puzyrnyi V. Formation of an effective model of training of the staff of the penitentiary system of Ukraine. Anal Comp Jurisprud. 2024;5(3):25–37. doi:10.24144/2788-6018.2024.04.70
[6] Smite HP, Ferdik F. Administrative perspectives: A qualitative study of correctional administrator impressions of a train-the-trainer model for the Prison Rape Elimination Act. J Crime Delinq. 2024. doi:10.1177/001112872413010
[7] Saputra JM. Pembentukan pelatihan lapangan kerja untuk narapidana yang telah bebas: Upaya untuk mengurangi angka residivis. J Jendela Inov Daerah. 2024;7(2):25–34.
[8] Mancino MA. Prison-based training programs, recidivism, and employment. 2023.
[9] Subramanian, R., Eisen, L.B., Hahn, J.W., Kang, J., Kaufman, A. and Seid, B., 2026. Prison Reform in the United States.
[10] Chadwick N, Ralph AD, Serin C. Effectively training community supervision officers: A meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome. Crim Justice Behav. 2015;42(10):977–989.
[11] Kasiri M, Goldoozian A, Karami D. The impact of imprisonment on crime prevention with an emphasis on Quranic teachings. Quranic Stud. 2019;(40):Winter. [in Persian].
[12] Alizadeh A. The role of team identity and organizational identity in job performance and social responsibility. J Public Organ Manag. 2022;2(8):109–124. [in Persian].
[13] Abedi M, Mokhtari H. The effect of prison architecture and environment on offenders. Presented at: 1st National Conference on Law, Social and Human Sciences, Psychology and Counseling; 2024. [in Persian].
[13] Marder ID, Kenny T, Kurz K. Restorative practices and relational prison leadership in Ireland. Contemporary Justice Review. 2025 Jan 2;28(1):110-32.
[14] Aos S, Lieb R, Mayfield J, Miller M, Pennucci A. Benefits and costs of prevention and early intervention programs for youth. Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2014.
[14] Wright KN. Prison environment and behavioral outcomes. J Offender Rehabil. 2005;20(1–2):93–113.
[15] Duwe G, Clark V. The effects of prison-based educational programming on recidivism and employment. Prison J. 2013;93(3):309–330.
[16] Harper DS. Assessing the professional competencies of correctional executives’ and senior-level leaders’. Correct Policy Pract Res. 2016;1(1):1–16. doi:10.1002/CBE2.1007
[17] Judiciary of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Judicial Transformation Document. Tehran: Strategic Center of the Judiciary; 2021. [in Persian].
[18] Newbold G, Johnston L, Richards SC. Training prison leaders in comparative perspective. London: Routledge; 2021.
[19] Salas E, Tannenbaum SI, Kraiger K, Smith-Jentsch KA. The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13(2):74–101. doi:10.1177/1529100612436661
[20] Travis J, Western B. The growth of incarceration in the United States: Exploring causes and consequences. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academies; 2014.
[21] Zautorova EV, Viktorova TV. Role of the competence approach in the formation of moral and volitional qualities among employees of the penal system in vocational training classes. Siberian Law J. 2023;11(4):3–13. doi:10.46741/sgjournal.2023.11.4.001.
[22] Walmsley R. World prison population list. 12th ed. Institute for Criminal Policy Research; 2018.
[23] Ollin R. Professionals or prisoners? The competency-based approach to professional development. In: Ollin R, editor. Professional development. Routledge; 2002. p. 82–96. Available from: https://scispace.com/papers/professionals-or-prisoners-the-competency-based-approach-to-398vtpuloc
[24] Maleki H, Jafari M, Fallahi H, Azizi NA. Evaluation of the effectiveness of vocational training in improving life conditions and reducing recidivism among prisoners. Vocat Train J. 2018;(26):127–156. [in Persian].
[25] Hormozi-Nejad M. The simple and multiple relationships between self-esteem, social anxiety, and perfectionism with assertiveness in students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz [Master’s thesis]. Ahvaz: Ahvaz University; 2021. [in Persian].
[26] Hersey P, Blanchard KH, Johnson DE. Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources. 10th ed. Pearson; 2013.
[27] Gonzalez P. Examining correctional leadership styles that encourage cooperative compliance from federal offenders. 2018. Available from: https://scispace.com/papers/examining-correctional-leadership-styles-that-encourage-2he3f6krl0
[28] Cramer RJ, Kaniuka AR, Peiper LJ. The core competency model for corrections: An education program for managing self-directed violence in correctional institutions. Psychol Serv. 2022;19(4):658–670.
[29] Burton AL, Lux JL, Cullen FT, Miller WT, Burton VS. Creating a model correctional officer training academy: Implications from a national survey. Fed Probation. 2018;82(1). Available from: https://scispace.com/papers/creating-a-model-correctional-officer-training-academy-onvk5xvkbg
[30] Bonta J. Training community supervision officers in the risk-need-responsivity model of offender rehabilitation: a review and implications. J Offender Rehabil. 2023;9(3):45–61.
[31]Andrews DA, Bonta J. The psychology of criminal conduct. 6th ed. Routledge; 2017.
[32] Salekin RT, Worley RM, Steiner B. Leadership training in correctional institutions: Evidence and future directions. Crim Justice Behav. 2020;47(8):919–938.
[33] Sohrabzadeh M, Niazi M, Mohammadi MS, Babaei H. Evaluating the effectiveness of the Sanandaj Central Prison program in reducing prisoners’ tendency to recidivism. Iran Soc Issues. 2023;7(2):53–72.
[34] Boyatzis RE. Resonant leadership: Renewing yourself and connecting with others through mindfulness, hope, and compassion. Harvard Business Review Press; 2008.
[35] Malekpour A. The extent of offenders’ susceptibility to recidivism during imprisonment. Mellal Res Mon. 2017;Tir [July]. [in Persian].