پیاده‌سازی سیستم‌های آموزشی هوشمند در بستر یادگیری سیار
محورهای موضوعی :محمود اکرامی 1 , منظر عزتی ابرغانی 2 *
1 - دانشگاه پیام نور
2 - ئانشگاه پیام نور
کلید واژه: سیستم¬, های آموزشی هوشمند, فناوری, موبایل, یادگیری سیار,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف بررسی شیوه های پیاده سازی سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند، موجب اطلاع رسانی درباره یادگیری سیار می شود. روش تحقیق نیمه تجربی بود. جامعه آماری را دانش آموزان پسر پایه سوم متوسطه اول مدارس هوشمند شهر گرمسار در نیم سال اول سال تحصیلی 97-96 تشکیل می دهند. بر اساس جدول مورگان 102 نفر به عنوان نمونه آماری به صورت تصادفی خوشه ای انتخاب، و در دو گروه آزمایش و گواه به صورت تصادفی جایگزین شدند. چند درس از کتاب زبان انگلیسی به عنوان محتوای آموزش انتخاب گردید و پیش از آموزش، از هر دو گروه پیش آزمونی گرفته شد. گروه گواه مطابق معمول، بر اساس سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند آموزش دیدند. اما یادگیری گروه آزمایش با استفاده از سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند به-واسطه ابزارهای سیار (تبلت و موبایل) بود. بعد از آموزش، پس آزمونی برگزار شد. داده های به دست آمده با استفاده از نرم-افزارSPSSv.18، در دو سطح آمار توصیفی و استنباطی (آزمون آماری T مستقل) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. ﻧﺘﺎﯾﺞ ﭘﮋوﻫﺶ ﻧﺸﺎن داد نمرات درس زبان انگلیسی گروه آزمایش که با استفاده از سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند در بستر یادگیری سیار آموزش دیدند، بیش از نمرات درس زبان انگلیسی گروه گواه که با استفاده از سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند آموزش دیدند بود (3.353t= و 0.001sig.=). بنابراین، می توان گفت پیاده سازی سیستم های آموزشی هوشمند در بستر یادگیری سیار اثرات مثبتی بر آموزش دارد.
Aim: The study is aimed to investigate the ways that implementing intelligent educational systems can inform mobile learning. Method: The research method was quasi-experimental. The statistical population is composed of male students of the third-grade secondary school of Smart in the city of Grammar of the academic year 97-96. According to Morgan schedule, in this study, 102 students of third grade high school from intelligent schools were selected using multistage cluster sampling and were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. Several lessons from the English language book were selected as the content of the training, and before the training, they were done on both groups of pre-tests. The control group was trained on an intelligent learning system as usual. But the learning group was experimenting with intelligent learning systems through mobile devices (tablets and mobiles). After training, the post-test was performed on both groups. Analyzee: Data were analyzed using SPSSv.18 software in two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics (independent t-test). Results: The results of the study showed that the English language test grades of the experimental group, which were trained using intelligent educational systems in the field of mobile learning, were more than the English language test grades that were taught using intelligent educational systems. So, we can say that the implementation of intelligent educational systems in the context of mobile learning has a positive effect on education.
1. Nori Y.]Intelligent Learning Units will bring mobile learning and technology together. Congratulations from the top e-creator of the electronic content of Guilan province. 2012. available at: http://shabestan.ir/detail/News/227973.
2. Liu X , Toki E I , Pange J. The use of ICT in preschool education in greece and China: A Comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,.112,.7,.1167- 76 available at http://www.sciencedirect.com. 2014.
3. Chaharband E. Intelligence of schools on the first subfamily . availableat: http://ijvlms.ir/online/browse.php?a_code=A-10-6-69&sid=1&slc_lang=fa 2017.
4. Sharifi A, Davoudi AH, Islamiyah F. The relationship between the use of information and communication technologies and the performance of teachers in the teaching and learning process , Information and Communication Technology in Educational second year. 4(8). . 2012.
5. HakimZadeh R, Abolghasemi N M, Nejati F. Comparison of the feeling of belonging to the school, the motivation for academic achievement and academic achievement among the students of intelligent schools (ICT) and ordinary schools of the year Third high school in Isfahan. Education Journal. 2013.
6. Noahi S, Hosseini S M, Rokhsarizadeh H, Sabouri A, Alishiri, Gh. ] Evaluation of Achievement Motivation and its Relationship with Academic Achievement in Medical[. Nursing and Health Care Students in a Medical University, Military Medicine14 (3). 200-204. . 2012.
7. Rajabi M. Comparison of the motivation of progress, self-regulation and academic achievement of third-year students of mathematics in ordinary and intelligent schools of Hamadan in the academic year 1392-1391. Master's thesis for educational technology.Arak University. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. 2013.
8. Beheshti Z. The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Mobile Learning.4 thNational Electrical Engineering Conference on. Islamic Azad University. Najaf Abad branch. Iran, March 15, 16. 2007.
9. Barzegar R, Dehghanzadeh H, Moghadamzadeh A. From E-learning to Mobile Learning Theoretical Foundations. MediaSummer. Volume 3. Number 2. . 2012.
10. El-Hussein N. O , Cronje J. C. Defining mobile learning in the higher educatoin landscape.Educational Technology&Society , 12-21. 2010.
11. Trinder J. Mobile learning evaluation: the development of tools and techniques for the evaluation of learning exploiting mobile devices through the analysis of automatically collected usage logs-an iterative approach .PhD Thesis . Glasgow, Scotland: University of glasgow. 2012.
12. Hashemi M, Ghasemi B. Using Mobile Phones in Language Learning/Teaching. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 Internet. p. 2947–51. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com. 2011.
13. Lai C. H , Yang J C, Chen F C, Ho Chant T W. Affordances of Mobile Technologies for Experiential Learning: The Interplay of Technology and Pedagogical Practices. Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 23, PP. 326-37. 2007
14. Zarnagar M. The role of mobile on learning. Available at http://vestasoftware.com/fa/blog/item/11-mlearning.2018.
15. Kashki H, Baghani M. Comparison of the role of teachers in synchronous and non-synchronous environment in e-learning. 2011. Fourth National Conference on Electronic Learning in Medical Sciences. 15-20. 2011.
16. Attewell J. From research and development to mobile learning: Tools for education and training providers and their learner . Retrieved from http://www.mlearn.org.za/cd/papers/Attewell.pdf. 2005.
17. Wang Y S, Wu M C ,Wang H Y. Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning .British Journal of Educational Technology , 92-118. 2009.
18. Jacob S M , Issac B. Mobile learning culture and effects in higher education. Ieee Multidisciplinary Engineering Education Magazine, 2 (2). 2007.
19. Rau P P, Gao Q, Wu L M. Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 50(1), 1-22. 2008.
20. McConatha D, Matt P, Michael J L. Mobile learning in the classroom: An empirical assessment of a new tool for students and teachers. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, TOJET, 7 (3), 2. 2008.
21. Dewitte C M. Integrating cell phones into the secondary Montessori classroom Doctoral dissertation, Walden University. Retrieved from http:// udini.proquest.com/view/integrating-cell-phones-intothe- goid:305229558/. 2010.
22. Nyamba S Y, Mlozi M R S. Factors influencing the use of mobile phones in communicating agricultural information: a case of kilolo district, iringa, Tanzania. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, 2(7), 558-63. 2012.
23. Bullock A Does. technology help doctors to access, use and share knowledge? Medical education. 48(1): 28-33.2014.
24. Naderi F, Porshafei H. Mobile Learning: Opportunities and Challenges. Third International Conference on Psychology; Educational Sciences and Lifestyle. Torbat Heydarieh University. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-ICPE03-ICPE03_252.html.2016.
25. Moradi I, Dideban H. The Position of Mobile Learning in Medical Sciences Universities: Opinions, Consequences and Challenges, Teb va Tazkiyeh. Summer. Volume 27. Issue 2. Pages 145-313. 2018.
26. Jahaniyan R, Etebar sh. Evaluation of the Situation of Virtual Education in E-Learning Centers of Universities of Tehran from Students' Perspectives. Information and Communication Technology in Education. 2 (4) 53-65. 2012.
27. Shohel M, Mahruf C, Power T. Introducing mobile technology for enhancing teaching and learning to the English language classroom in Bangladesh. Department of Education, The Open University.2010.
28. ShahMohammadi A M, Kohi F A. Mobile Application and Text Messaging in Science Education. 8th Seminar on Chemistry of Iran. 6th and 7th of September. Semnan University. 2014.