Designing and explaining the professional development model of the departments chairs of the University of Tehran based on a Lean approach
Subject Areas :
mojtaba
hajkhozeymh
1
(Tehran)
Khodayar
Abili
2
(Tehran)
javad
pourkarimi
3
(Tehran)
Keywords: Professional Development, Lean Approach, Heads of departments, University of tehran,
Abstract :
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to design and explain the professional development model of the departments chairs of the University of Tehran based on a Lean approach. Method: This research was carried out in two qualitative and quantitative stages, using the mixed exploratory research method. The qualitative part of the research was done in two stages. In the first stage of the qualitative section, the existing research background related to the components of professional development of department heads based on a lean approach in Persian and English between 2000 and 2020 was reviewed. After searching, screening and qualitative evaluation of the studies, the final synthesis was performed on 72 studies. In the second stage of the qualitative section, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 experts and experts in the field of higher education who were purposefully selected to identify the appropriate pattern of the context of the University of Tehran. Qualitative data analysis was performed using open and axial coding (theme analysis) and its reliability and validity were evaluated. In the quantitative stage, the descriptive-analytical research method and the statistical population included all the managers of the departments of the University of Tehran with 252 people who using Cochran's sampling formula, 152 people were selected as the sample. Sampling method in this study was stratified random sampling method. In the quantitative part, the required data were collected using a researcher-made questionnaire. To evaluate the validity of the quantitative research instrument, content validity and construct validity were used and to evaluate the reliability of the instrument, Cronbach's alpha was used, which confirmed the appropriate reliability and validity of the research instrument. Results: The results showed that the professional development of the managers of the departments of the University of Tehran based on a lean approach has five main components (1. Lean leadership / management skills, 2. Lean student skills, 3. Lean research skills, 4. Lean behavioral skills and 5. Skills Lean individual) and 19 indicators. The results of the second-order confirmatory factor analysis showed that the five identified components have a sufficient factor load to predict the professional development of department heads of the University of Tehran based on a lean approach. The results of one-sample t-test showed that the managers of the departments of the University of Tehran evaluated the general situation of their professional development based on a lean approach at a moderate level. Conclusion:The five main components of this research can be an effective model for the professional development of department heads in university of Tehran and have beneficial results in promoting quality, efficiency, effectiveness and waste reduction in university of Tehran.
1- Abili K, Naderi A, Asarzadeh R. The relationship between training and knowledge management and providing solutions to improve it: Case of Iranian Offshore Oil Company. Qtly Hum Res Manage Oil Ind . 2014. 22(6):179-208[Persian].
2- Viitala,R. Perceived development needs of managers compared to an integrated management competency model. Journal of Workplace Learning. 2005.17(7),436-451.
3- Radnor Z, Bucci G. Analysis of Lean Implementation in UK Business
Schools and Universities. London, UK: Association of Business Schools
Lean Report. . 2011.
4- Javanak Liavali,M. Abili.kh. Pourkarimi,J. Soltani Arabshahi. Providing a Pattern of Professional Development of Clinical Department Chairs: A Case of State Universities of Medical Sciences in Tehran. Educ Strategy Med Sci. 2017; 10 (3) : 202-218.[Persian].
5- Araste,H. Management at universities dependent with the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Challenges and Shortcomings. RPHE. 2001.21,41-69. [Persian].
6- Dahlgaard, J. Ostergraad, P. TQM and Lean thinking in higher education. Shnergie rapporti di ricerca, 2000.9, 23-42.
7- Thirkell, Emma and Ashman, Ian . Lean towards learning: connecting Lean Thinking and human resource management in UK higher education. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2014. 25 (21). pp. 2957-2977.
8- Villegas-Reimers,E . Teacher professional development:an international review of the literature. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.2003.
9- Giri,k.Frankel,N.Tulenko,K.Puckett,A.Baily,R.Ross,H. Keeping Up to Date: Continuing Professional Development for Health Workers in Developing Countries.2012.
10- Steinert Y. Faculty development: Core concepts and principles. In: Steinert Y, editors. Faculty Development in health professions: A Focus on research and practice, Innovation and change in professional Education. New York City.2014: 3- 28.
11- Evans.L. University professors as academic leaders: professorial leadership development needs and provision. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 2017.Vol. 45(1) 123–140.
12- Dopson.S, Ferlie.E, McGivern.G, Fischer.M, Mitra.M, Ledger.J, Behrens.S. Leadership development in Higher Education: A literature review and implications for programme redesign. Higher Education Quarterly.2018. PP:1-17. DOI: 10.1111/hequ.12194.
13- Hooshisadast.SA, Rahimian.H, Abbaspour.A, Khorsandi.A, Ghiasi Nodooshan,S. Designing a Lean University Model for Public Universities (Case Study: Farhangian Teacher Education University). Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences.2018. No(49),Vo(11),PP:132-141. ] Persian[.
14- Emiliani,M.L. "Engaging faculty in Lean teaching", International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2015. Vol. 6 No: 1, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2014-0015.
15- Balzer, W. K. Brodke, M. H. & Thomas Kizhakethalackal, E. Lean higher education: successes, challenges, and realizing potential. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2015.32(9), 924-933.
16- Wisniewski.M.A. Leadership Development for Academic Chairs: Programs for promoting Competence in Higher Education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 2019. PP:1–4, DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2019.1642718.
17- Fields.J, Kenny.N.A, Mueller.R.A. Conceptualizing educational leadership in an academic development program. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT.2018.PP:1-14. doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1570211.
18- Hofer, S. & Naeve, J. The application of Lean Management in higher education. International Journal of Contemporary Management,2018. 16(4).
19- Lu.J, Laux.C, Antony.J. "Lean Six Sigma leadership in higher education institutions", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 2017. Vol. 66 No: 5, pp.638-650.
20- Waterbury, T. Learning from the pioneers: A multiple-case analysis of implementing Lean in higher education. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.2015. Vol:32,No:9,PP: 934-950.
21- Svensson, C. Antony, J. Ba-Essa, M. Bakhsh, M. & Albliwi, S. A Lean Six Sigma program in higher education. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2015.39(2), 951-969.
22- Spendlove, M. "Competencies for effective leadership in higher education", International Journal of Educational Management,2007, 21 (5), 407-417.
23- Jahaniyan, R ."Required qualifications of educational Administrator", Journal of Educational Administration Research, 2010, 1 (3), 121 -142. [Persian].
24- Ghavidel, A. "Lean Management and its Application in Education", extensive management journal, 2015, 1 (1), 52-61. ] Persian[.
25- Van Dun, D. H., Hicks, J. N., Wilderom, C. P. "Values and behaviors of effective lean managers: Mixed-methods exploratory research" , European management journal,2017, 35 (2), 174-186.